How USCIS Evaluates Einstein Visa Petitions Using a Two-Step Framework
Key Takeaways: USCIS uses a two-step analysis from the Kazarian v. USCIS decision to evaluate every EB-1A extraordinary ability petition. Step 1 verifies whether evidence meets at least three of ten regulatory criteria. Step 2 assesses whether the individual truly stands among the small percentage at the top of their field. Meeting three criteria alone does not guarantee approval. An experienced immigration attorney can help build a petition addressing both steps with persuasive evidence.
The Einstein visa, formally known as the EB-1A extraordinary ability green card, requires petitioners to pass a structured two-step review before USCIS approval. This process, formalized through USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0005 following the Ninth Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kazarian v. USCIS, 596 F.3d 1115 (9th Cir. 2010), governs how officers evaluate whether someone has risen to the top of their field. Understanding each step is essential for accomplished professionals, researchers, artists, or entrepreneurs preparing to self-petition. The distinction between meeting evidentiary criteria and proving sustained acclaim is where many petitions fall short.
We’re an award-winning law firm in San Diego, California, with 50+ years of experience in immigration law. Talk to an immigration attorney at Feldman Feldman & Associates PC by calling 1-619-299-9600 today.
What Is Step 1 of the Einstein Visa Adjudication Process?
Step 1 requires USCIS to determine whether submitted evidence satisfies the initial evidentiary threshold. Under the USCIS Policy Manual, applicants must show either a one-time achievement like a Nobel Prize, or evidence meeting at least three of ten regulatory criteria listed at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3). These criteria cover awards, memberships, published material, judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, exhibitions, leading roles, high salary, and commercial success.
Officers apply a preponderance of the evidence standard at this stage. You must show it is more likely than not that your documentation satisfies a given criterion. USCIS cannot deny a petition because you did not address every criterion. Decisions are based on the type and quality of evidence submitted, not assumptions about unaddressed criteria.
Which Criteria Count Toward Step 1?
You only need three of the ten regulatory criteria to clear Step 1, but choosing the right three matters. Each criterion has specific evidentiary requirements, and documentation must be credible and clearly tied to the criterion claimed.
| Criterion | Common Evidence Examples |
|---|---|
| Awards or prizes | National or international awards for excellence in the field |
| Membership in associations | Membership requiring outstanding achievements, as judged by recognized peers |
| Published material about the petitioner | Articles in professional or major trade publications or major media |
| Judging the work of others | Service as a judge of others’ work in the same or allied field |
| Original contributions of major significance | Evidence of original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business contributions |
| Authorship of scholarly articles | Published scholarly articles in professional journals or major media |
| Display of work at exhibitions or showcases | Artistic exhibitions or showcases of the petitioner’s work |
| Leading or critical role in distinguished organizations | Evidence of performing a leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation |
| High salary or remuneration | Compensation significantly above others in the field |
| Commercial success in the performing arts | Box office receipts, sales records, or other indicators of commercial success |
💡 Pro Tip: Focus on criteria where you have the strongest, most verifiable documentary evidence. Well-supported claims under three criteria outperform thin evidence across five or six.
What Happens During the USCIS Final Merits Determination?
Step 2 evaluates whether the totality of evidence shows you belong among the small percentage at the top of your field. Clearing three criteria in Step 1 is necessary but not sufficient. The USCIS Policy Manual states that "objectively meeting the regulatory criteria in the first step alone does not establish that the person in fact meets the requirements for classification as a person with extraordinary ability."
Officers consider all potentially relevant evidence during this step, even evidence outside the ten regulatory criteria. This holistic review examines your career’s overall picture, including contribution significance, recognition scope, and whether acclaim has been sustained over time. Past national recognition without maintained acclaim may fail this step.
How Does Sustained Acclaim Factor Into Step 2?
USCIS requires that your extraordinary ability be current, not just historical. The policy manual notes that past acclaim must be maintained. To qualify for an EB-1 visa, you must demonstrate intent to continue working in your demonstrated area of ability. Evidence should reflect ongoing recognition, recent contributions, and active field engagement.
💡 Pro Tip: Include recent evidence alongside older accomplishments. Strong petitions show sustained achievement trajectories, not single peak moments from years ago.
Why Does the Two-Step Review Matter for Your Einstein Visa Petition?
The two-step framework creates consistent adjudication standards across all USCIS service centers. Policy memorandum PM-602-0005, issued December 22, 2010, responded to the Ninth Circuit’s criticism in Kazarian of officers imposing extra-regulatory evidentiary requirements. It ensures uniform Form I-140 processing while distinguishing between meeting a checklist and demonstrating true extraordinary ability.
Not everyone agrees the two-step approach is ideal. NAFSA, with nearly 10,000 members, expressed concern that Step 2 introduces subjectivity beyond regulatory requirements. NAFSA argued that reliable evidence meeting regulatory criteria should create a presumption of eligibility. Their comments on EB-1 adjudication remain valuable for understanding this policy debate.
💡 Pro Tip: Understanding the NAFSA critique helps anticipate Step 2 evaluation. Build narratives addressing both the regulatory checklist and whether achievements place you at the top.
How Does the Einstein Visa Standard Compare to O-1 Status?
The EB-1A extraordinary ability standard is higher than O-1 nonimmigrant status, though both categories share similar regulatory language. The EB-1A requires sustained national or international acclaim and being among the small percentage at the field’s top. The O-1A visa (sciences, education, business, athletics) uses similar "extraordinary ability" language but requires a lesser showing because it’s temporary, not permanent. The O-1B visa (arts) applies an even lower threshold, "distinction," defined as achievement substantially above that ordinarily encountered. An arts professional may qualify for O-1B based on distinction but fall short of the EB-1A standard for an extraordinary ability green card.
This distinction is critical for petitioners with O-1 status who assume EB-1A will follow automatically. USCIS applies a more demanding threshold for permanent immigration benefits.
💡 Pro Tip: Don’t simply resubmit O-1 evidence for EB-1A petitions. Update and strengthen documentation to reflect continued achievements and address the higher standard.
What Did the 2024 USCIS Policy Updates Change for EB-1A Cases?
USCIS issued policy updates in September 2023 and October 2024 clarifying several Einstein visa criteria evaluations. Key October 2024 changes include accepting team awards as qualifying evidence, confirming past memberships satisfy the membership criterion even if no longer current, and removing Policy Manual language suggesting published material must demonstrate the value of contributions.
These updates reflect more flexible evidence evaluation. For petitioners in collaborative fields like scientific research or team sports, team awards can open previously difficult criteria. The revised published material standard may benefit individuals whose media coverage focused on career trajectory without explicitly assessing contribution value.
How Should You Prepare Your Evidence in Light of These Changes?
Review evidence against current USCIS guidance before filing. Policy updates shift what officers look for. Working with an immigration attorney tracking USCIS adjudication trends helps present evidence aligned with current regulatory interpretation.
💡 Pro Tip: Even with flexible standards, quality outweighs quantity. Strong, well-documented evidence under each claimed criterion generally outperforms large volumes of marginal documentation.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Can USCIS deny my Einstein visa petition even if I meet three of the ten criteria?
Yes. Meeting three criteria clears Step 1, but USCIS must conduct a final merits determination in Step 2. Officers evaluate whether evidence totality demonstrates you’re among the small percentage at the field’s top. Satisfying the initial checklist alone is insufficient for approval.
2. What standard of proof does USCIS apply when reviewing EB-1A evidence?
USCIS applies a preponderance of the evidence standard. You must show it is more likely than not that evidence satisfies claimed criteria. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt isn’t required, but documentation must be credible and clearly support each claimed criterion.
3. Does USCIS consider evidence that does not fit one of the ten regulatory criteria?
Yes, during Step 2. The USCIS Policy Manual directs officers to consider any potentially relevant evidence during final merits determination, even evidence outside the ten criteria. This holistic review can favor petitioners with strong achievements outside standard categories.
4. How is the EB-1A different from the O-1 visa in terms of the standard applied?
The EB-1A requires higher achievement. EB-1A demands sustained national or international acclaim and being among the small percentage at the field’s top. O-1A uses similar language but has a lower threshold for temporary benefits, while O-1B requires only "distinction." O-1 status doesn’t automatically qualify you for EB-1A. Each category has its own standard, and EB-1A demands stronger, more comprehensive evidence.
Building a Strong EB-1A Petition Starts With Understanding the Process
Knowing how USCIS structures its review gives you a significant advantage when preparing your Einstein visa petition. The two-step framework shapes what evidence you need, how you present it, and what narrative you build. From selecting criteria in Step 1 to demonstrating sustained acclaim in Step 2, every petition element should be intentional and well-documented. Because outcomes depend on specific facts, working with an attorney who understands current USCIS adjudication trends makes a meaningful difference.
If you are ready for your extraordinary ability green card, Feldman Feldman & Associates PC can help. Reach out by contacting us today or calling 1-619-299-9600.
